Trinity Survey Results

I want to say thank you to everyone who filled out the survey. Roughly 1/3 of our congregation completed the survey. This has been helpful to me to pick an area of focus for a research project and sermon series that I’ll be preaching in March, 2024. We’ll be considering the person of the Son from John 1 and John 5 and how that helps us see the triune nature of our God.

I wanted to share the survey results publicly. I’ve added my own comments to each question. I’m not able to comment exhaustively in this post but I hope this will pique your interest and cause you to look more carefully at our God who has made himself known to us.

This question tells me that the orthodox understanding of the Trinity is nearly universally accepted. God indeed is one yet has revealed himself in three persons. John Gill, an ardent defender of the Trinity, says, “there is a Trinity of Persons in the Unity of the divine Essence.”

The keyword in this question is “eternally.” This has been hotly debated in recent years. A controversial teaching within evangelicalism known as the Eternal Subordination of the Son (ESS) or Eternal Functional Submission (EFS) argues that the Son is eternally subordinate to the Father. Clearly there is subordination of the Son in the incarnation, but whether this is an eternal subordination has been rejected and soundly refuted by most theologians. As a result, very few theologians defend ESS or EFS today but it is a common belief in the pew.

Questions 3 & 4 reveal that many believe that the ancient creeds are important but there are many who do not know what those ancient creeds contain. This can be a problem in modern times when we aren’t familiar with the conversations and battles that were fought in previous years to refine our understanding of Scripture. Our forefathers in the faith provide language, nuance, and dealt with errors that continue to crop up. It is best if we understand how the Spirit worked through them to lay a foundation upon which we stand.

This question is a little tricky. It is true that God is seen in what he does, but he cannot be defined by what he does. That is, the economic Trinity (the roles of Father, Son, and Spirit in salvation) do not necessarily tells who God is from all eternity. Historically, theologians have made distinctions between who God is in himself, and what God does.

Most answered this correctly. God has one will. To affirm that God has three wills is to affirm tritheism and not the Trinitarian God of Scripture. It is important to the ESS or EFS controversy to maintain that God has one will. Subordination in the Trinity implies more than one will, yet God is one. (It is true that in the incarnation, the person of Christ, with his human will, submits his will to God. Yet, the triune God has one will.)

The eternal generation of the Son is indeed a biblical doctrine. This language was made famous by Augustine but is rarely taught today. The eternal generation of the Son describes how the Son is from the Father from all eternity. He is eternally begotten but not made. Where this is found biblically, and its consequence will come out later in my sermon series (for keeners, see John 5:26 in context).

Glad to see that most people understand that the Trinity is relevant and practical. As a bonus you should ask yourself, “In what ways is knowing God as triune practical?”

This is a question that touches on the recent ESS (EFS) controversy. Many mistakes have been made in conceiving God as a reflection of society or persons. While it is common to think that hierarchies reflect the Trinity they do not since God is not a hierarchy in himself.

It seems to me that Pentecostal or charismatic theology has impacted the evangelical world at this point. They maintain that the Holy Spirit is neglected today. However, we do not see in Scripture the Holy Spirit being worshipped in the same measure and manner as the Father and Son. Rather it is the role of Christ to make much of the Father and it is the role of the Spirit to make much of Christ. Consider prayer. Prayer is made to the Father, in the name of the Son, and through the power of the Spirit. Prayer is Trinitarian by nature. It doesn’t become Trinitarian when we pray equally to all three persons. Our worship is Trinitarian when we worship the Father because of Jesus through the Spirit who mediates the presence of God. For more on this, Jesus’ teaching on the Holy Spirit in John 14–16 is helpful.

In March, I’ll be preaching a three-part series on the Trinity looking at John 1 and John 5. May the Lord use his word to build his church and increase our knowledge and love of him.

Tim Stephens

Emergencies Act Abuse

In a landmark decision, a federal court determined that the Canadian government’s use of the Emergencies Act (formerly known as the War Measures Act) was unconstitutional. The Act gives the federal government extraordinary power to handle national emergencies. The judge determined the use of the Act to end the trucker convoy was ultra vires (“beyond the powers”), or quite simply, illegal.[1] The truckers were protesting the government’s abuse of power, and now a federal judge has ruled that the government abused their power to stop truckers from protesting their abuse of power. Got it?

The legal and political ramifications of this decision continue to be discussed and time will tell the full impact this ruling will have. What I want to do is consider how Christians should think regarding this decision. What does this mean for the church of Christ? What lessons can we learn?

Let me offer five points of reflection and application:

1. This is vindication.

The witnesses of the trucker convoy can testify that this protest was no act of insurrection or national crisis. This was an act of (effective) protest after years of government overreach and abuse. How do you get the attention of a government that refuses to listen? Answer: You fill the nation’s capital with tractor trailers and honk! To add to the power of the protest, wave Canadian flags, set up bouncy castles, sing the national anthem, pray together and listen to street preaching.

The Trudeau government refused to listen to the concerns of the truckers (and many other Canadians) whose lives and livelihoods had been adversely affected after years of health mandates—most pernicious were those coercive vaccine mandates. Rather than listen, the government invoked the Emergencies Act which turned our nation’s capital into a police state more reminiscent of Nazi Germany than the free and democratic society Canada wants to be known for.

With that background, this court ruling offers some vindication to those who said the government was abusing their power. They abused their power and they got caught. In fact, both the Alberta lockdown orders and now the use of the Emergencies Act were declared illegal by the courts.

This is not only vindication legally but also for Christians who supported the truckers. Many evangelical leaders siding against the truckers cited Romans 13 as justification to comply with the governing authorities. But they failed to properly consider that our governing authorities were themselves accountable to the law. If the governing authorities break the law or violate the charter, it is incumbent upon lesser magistrates, like police chiefs (and even pastors), to say “No!” Christians who supported freedom were chastised by other Christians are scofflaws and rebellious. It turns out that it was our governing authorities who were the scofflaws and rebellious. We should understand this by now: by no means does Romans 13 compel Christians to submit to unjust laws. Rather, Christians must stand for justice even if they suffer heavy personal consequences.

2. It’s a small victory among a string of losses.

Freedom has eroded in Canada. The courts are not always on the side of truth and justice. Our brothers and sisters at Trinity Bible Chapel have lost multiple appeals and were forced to pay large fines for contempt and breaking the Reopening Ontario Act. This small victory does not alter the trajectory of our nation. Enthusiasm in this court decision must be tempered because the worldview that cast our country into lockdown ruin is still thriving. Canada remains a haven for cultural Marxism, multiple critical theories, communistic socialism, big government, and a militant secularism that wants to eradicate our Christian heritage. This may be a victory in court, but the evil one still uses the public schools, universities, colleges, media, entertainment industry, and government to wage war against the ultimate standard—God’s standard—of truth and justice.

We must remember that real and lasting change won’t come through the courts but through changed hearts as people in our country repent of sin and unbelief and submit themselves to the rightful heir of the universe, Jesus Christ. He is the great judge who will render the final and ultimate vindication when he finally rids the world of sin and death.

3. The silent church must speak up.

The trucker convoy happened because the church remained silent. Before the vaccine mandates and travel restrictions came down heavy upon the truckers, the government restricted the church. Before they went after the physical body with vaccine mandates, they shut down Christ’s body with worship mandates. If the church stood and spoke to resist lockdowns there would be no attempt to coerce vaccination through punitive government measures. Pinching a little incense now will lead to greater sacrifices later.

When James Coates went to jail in early 2021, that should have been the rallying cry for the church to stand and speak. If all the churches were open on that Sunday, the tyranny would have been over on Monday. So many revere the truckers as heroes (and they are), but this could have been the spotlight on the church of Christ. It could have been the church in Canada that was recognized around the world as defenders of liberty and bold to stand against government overreach.

This is not to say that many Christians did not speak up. There were many Christian undertones to the convoy. But the church, and pastors leading them, are not standing to provide the needed spiritual guidance for the spiritual battle that is taking place. Even famous atheists are recognizing that there is a spiritual battle taking place. Where is the church?

If attention was brought to the church, as it continues today for the truckers, then society would be talking about the lordship of Christ and the centrality of Christianity to freedom. Rather than similar trucker convoys around the world being the voice of freedom, it would be the global church doing the same. This was a missed opportunity for the church to bear public witness of the beauty and truth of the Lordship of Christ over all. May this not remain a missed opportunity but a lesson learned with repentance and a commitment to the future defense of justice and truth.

4. We need Christians in all areas of public life.

This court victory before the backdrop of eroding freedom calls not just the church, but individual Christians to live by and speak of Christ’s lordship in all areas of life.

We need Christians in places of prominence and power. Lawyers, judges, members of parliament, members of provincial legislative assemblies, doctors, educators, and every other field and position of influence. Some people, even many Christian leaders today, think this a scary prospect. But why would anyone want to exclude from positions of power those commanded to “do nothing from selfish ambition or conceit, but in humility count others more significant than yourselves” (Phil 2:3)? Why would we think it bad to have Christians as societal influencers when they are commanded to love their neighbor as themselves? Christianity, more than anything, has been the greatest force for societal good this world has ever seen! Christians need to stop apologizing and making concessions to evil to have evil-minded people think them loving. Christians need to fulfill the cultural mandate and be workers in God’s creation to advance truth, beauty, and goodness.

Christians must live the Christian life in the public sphere and churches must equip them and disciple them in their calling. The church feels comfortable telling fathers and mothers how to live in the home. The church needs to be just as comfortable telling men and women how to live in the culture or in business and politics. Rather that a society submitted to DEI (diversity-equity-inclusion), we need a society submitted to timorem dei (the fear of God). Christians must desire and labor to see all of life yielded to the lordship of Christ.

5. We must prepare for future conflict.

Conflict is inevitable. We live in a world that resists Christ and his advancing kingdom. There are overt enemies of Christ and his gospel. There are counterfeits that ape gospel truth, promise salvation, but send nations to hell. There are many antichrists in this world which pretend to be friends of Christ but are in fact his enemies. We live in an age of antithesis, darkness versus light.

How should one prepare for future battles? Here are a few suggestions:

Take your family to a biblical church that preaches the gospel every week and consistently heralds the absolute lordship of Christ over everything. Get involved. Make friendships. You need the church and the church needs you.

Get your home in order—build a Christian home. Persevere in family worship. Sing the psalms. Pray daily. Read God’s word. Teach your children. Feast and celebrate. Practice hospitality. Order your home for the benefit of the church and the city you’re in. Strong Christian homes make strong Christian churches which are a powerful force for good in a world gone bad.

Don’t spend hours a day in doomsday news. We know it’s bad already. Do something good. Live for Christ where you are. Get involved in living the Christian life in the world rather that flipping through postcards of other Christians out there in the battle.

Have joy. Remember Christ our conquering king has defeated death and rose from the grave. He is presently ruling from the right hand of the Father. He will hold you fast. He prays for you even now. He will receive the reward for his suffering. He will win the day. Christ is our light and song. Take heart and be joyful. Christians must be people with swords and smiles.

Tim Stephens


[1] The COVID health mandates in Alberta were also ruled ultra vires. The health mandates were enacted illegally and therefore not binding nor any prosecution that depends upon them. In brief, it was an illegal use of the law by the ones entrusted to keep the rule of law.

Natural Law and Sexual Ethics

We live in a time of sexual “freedom.” It seems that anything—or almost anything—goes. Christian ethics regarding sexuality is seen as archaic, joy-killing, and harmful. What is most putrid to this sexualized culture is when someone attempts to use Bible verses to justify a sexual ethic or a vision of marriage. The Bible is dismissed as unauthoritative and irrelevant. Some people, well-meaning I’m sure, have taken the bait and seek to argue for sexual ethics in society and in marriage using natural law alone. That is, an argument based solely on a morality common to all and visible in the created order. However, this appeal to natural law, apart from divine revelation, becomes a wax nose that can be bent any which way.

In fact, in first century Corinth, people appealed to a kind of natural law to justify their sexual ethic quite contrary to a Christian worldview. There was a slogan in Corinth: “Food is meant for the stomach and the stomach for food” (1 Corinthians 6:13). The application of this natural law? If your belly craves food, then satisfy it. That’s what it’s made for. It’s only natural. But for the Corinthians, the application extended to sex as well. If your body craves sex, then satisfy it. Their appeal to natural law seems logical and is likely just as persuasive in our day as it was in theirs. The body has natural cravings for food and sex, and it is not wrong to satisfy it. That’s how the body works. It’s only natural. Therefore, the Corinthians were justifying sex with prostitutes as no big deal, just a natural bodily function!

How does Paul answer such an appeal to nature? He answers with Scripture. He quotes from Genesis and says, “For, as it is written, ‘The two will become one flesh’” (1 Corinthians 6:16). He goes on to explain that sex is not just physical but joins two bodies—and two spirits—together into one unity. There is a spiritual reality that transcends physical appearances. Sexual immorality is especially grievous for the Christian since “he who is joined to the Lord becomes one spirit with him” (1 Corinthians 6:17). So he asks, “Do you not know that your bodies are members of Christ? Shall I then take the members of Christ and make them members of a prostitute? Never!” (1 Corinthians 6:15). What Paul is saying here is profound.

Like the spiritual connection we have in Christ through faith, sex joins two together into a spiritual union. What the Scriptures teach is that sex is much more than a physical craving that is to be satisfied. It has a unique and sacred purpose in God’s design of humanity.

Apart from Scripture and divine revelation, solely relying on “natural” law leaves us rudderless and prone to terrible consequences. I’m convinced that the pain, brokenness, disillusionment, depression, isolation, emptiness and hopelessness of those pursuing sexual “freedom” is because they are ignorant of—or rebellious to—God’s purpose and plan for sex and marriage. Without this knowledge from God people approach sex as a physical craving and run headlong into spiritual (and physical) ruin. The committed husband and wife who remained chaste before marriage and remain faithful to each other until the end have an infinitely better “sex life” than those who join themselves with countless others. I can say this, not just from collective human experience, but ultimately based on the authority of divine revelation.

In sum, we need a word from God to orient our lives—and every aspect of our lives. Thanks be to God that he has given us a book. We ignore it to our own peril. May we not be ashamed to employ God’s word, even in a world that thinks it irrelevant and unauthoritative. Throwing away our greatest weapon and restraining ourselves to use natural law in a sexualized age is foolhardy. “To the teaching and to the testimony! If they will not speak according to this word, it is because they have no dawn” (Isaiah 8:20).

Tim Stephens

The Cult of the Expert

Penned in 375 BC, Plato’s Republic argues for the ideal state. This state would be one of bliss and prosperity. His idea? A ruling class of philosophers serving as Guardians to order life in the city. The ruling elite or philosopher king would rely on a lifetime of special education which will enable him to “be the savior of his country, as well as himself” (Republic, 6.497).

Ideas have a way of reappearing again and again in history—including bad ideas. As the Preacher said, “There is nothing new under the sun” (Ecclesiastes 1:9). We see the same spirit of Plato’s vision in Western culture today. Increasingly we are seeing “experts” who pontificate on civic and familial matters to direct a city or nation into truth and prosperity. Whether the issue is climate change, healthcare, domestic or foreign policy, there are scientists, experts and specialists that provide the answers and solutions to save the rest of us. We hear phrases like, “Scientists agree…” or “The science says…” and what follows is taken to be as authoritative as divine revelation. It’s the cult of the expert. Who are we to disagree with science? Who are we to disagree with the specialist?

There are several problems with this cult of the expert in our society today. One is the absence and denigration of the generalist. Increasingly education is highly focused in one field of study to the neglect of other areas of life. With this specialization typically comes an emphasis on training for a specific job or role rather than cultivating a mind to think. In the past few years we’ve seen medical experts grab the political steering wheel to avoid a viral contagion only to drive us over the cliff into economic ruin and social chaos. These experts focused on physical health but acted without considering emotional, spiritual, relational, or economic health—just to name a few. Dissenting opinions were ignored and those with knowledge in other fields were silenced. Phrases like “You’re not an epidemiologist,” shut down the conversation and kept the car in gear and the gas pedal down as we continued veering off course.

The second major problem is that our ruling elites rule as if there is no God. As God said through Hosea, “My people are destroyed for lack of knowledge” (Hosea 4:6). And what knowledge did they lack? There was “no knowledge of God in the land” (Hosea 4:1). This resulted in “swearing, lying, murder, stealing, and committing adultery; they break all bounds, and bloodshed follows bloodshed” (Hosea 4:2). No matter how educated the ruling class is, if there is no knowledge of God the nation will languish and groan. God’s word is not consulted nor is there subjection to his Christ. The experts are blindly leading unless and until they pay homage to the King and take heed according to his word.

What can Christians do? I suggest two solutions:

First, rather than constant deferral to experts, it is time we grew to value the generalist and those who have a wide range of knowledge which spans multiple disciplines. Not only that, but as Christian parents we should want our children to be able to think critically in a multi-disciplinary fashion rather than just train them for a task or role. Better than counting how many experts agree—and sorting through the funny business that happens in these counts—we need to encourage thinking that can analyze the big picture. Let us create a culture of thinking that incorporates studies in history, science, philosophy, theology, and the arts. A thinking mind is a beautiful reflection of the image of God in man. There is a good intellectualism that submits itself to God and his truth, goodness, and beauty.

Second, and most importantly, it is incumbent upon Christians to take up the mantle of being biblically wise so that we are able to live and give instruction. The Scriptures are a treasury of knowledge, and the fear of the Lord is the beginning of wisdom (Proverbs 9:10). Let us never forget this. It is the knowledge of God that provides the foundation for wisdom in all facets of life—including healthcare, business, and foreign policy. He is the source of all truth. As we seek to know God through his word and seek to apply that knowledge to all areas of life, we are best suited to think with clarity, insight, and skill. One day we will rule with Christ (Revelation 5:10), judge the world and even judge angels (1 Corinthians 6:2–3). So let us commit to learn of God from his word and live in his world with wisdom.

While the world seeks to mimic Plato’s Republic with philosopher kings, let us live considering God’s kingdom with Christ our King, who is the King of all kings. Let us, through our actions and thinking, shine the light of Christ through our lives, families, education and vocations.

Tim Stephens

Principles of Service

Christian service has been on my mind the last month or so. A few of us have been discussing cleaning and maintenance needs in and around the building and the advantages and disadvantages of having a paid caretaker. Coupled with this is the weekly Fellowship Lunch with its demands of a weekly setup and cleanup. Throughout this discussion there has been a burden among the elders to treat all areas of need as an opportunity for discipleship.

The elders wish to avoid the large church model which typically employs staff and paid contractors to do the bulk of the work in and around the church. The congregation is encouraged to give their money and that money pays for the work to get done. This ends up creating a congregation of donors rather than servants. This model is more restaurant-like where you pay for your food to be prepared and your mess to be cleaned up. We want a model more akin to a family where we work together in preparation, enjoy eating together, and help each other clean up afterwards. The family model produces servants rather than consumers. Jesus did not come to be served but to serve, and he is our example to follow.

To help us with a biblical understanding of service, I’ve summarized 8 principles with Scriptural proofs. Please consider them while asking, “How do I—or can I—obey these commands from my Lord?”

1. Every member is a servant.

Everyone should be serving the body. It is not optional. It is not a free-will offering (like volunteering). It is a responsibility, privilege, and command of the Lord. It’s not a matter of whether you serve but how you serve.

As each has received a gift, use it to serve one another, as good stewards of God’s varied grace: whoever speaks, as one who speaks oracles of God; whoever serves, as one who serves by the strength that God supplies—in order that in everything God may be glorified through Jesus Christ. To him belong glory and dominion forever and ever. Amen” (1 Peter 4:10–11).

For as in one body we have many members, and the members do not all have the same function, so we, though many, are one body in Christ, and individually members one of another. Having gifts that differ according to the grace given to us, let us use them: if prophecy, in proportion to our faith; if service, in our serving; the one who teaches, in his teaching; the one who exhorts, in his exhortation; the one who contributes, in generosity; the one who leads, with zeal; the one who does acts of mercy, with cheerfulness” (Romans 12:4–8).

2. All servant roles are vital.

We can’t all serve in the same way, but our service is to the same Lord and all service is for the common good. Some roles in the church are seen as more glorious or having more honor.

Many desire to teach, but few are willing to clean the bathroom. Yet do you not understand that the one who teaches and the one who cleans the bathroom serves the same Lord and is empowered by the same Spirit? Both are part of the body, and both are needed. In fact, those jobs that are hard and lowly—that seem “weaker”—are indispensable. Jesus wrapped himself in a towel, got on his knees, and washed the disciples’ feet. This was the role of a slave. Yet Jesus modeled for us how to serve in “lowly” tasks for the glory of God. If you are looking for ways to serve, these “lowly” tasks, like cleaning, always have the greatest need.

Now there are varieties of gifts, but the same Spirit; and there are varieties of service, but the same Lord; and there are varieties of activities, but it is the same God who empowers them all in everyone. To each is given the manifestation of the Spirit for the common good.”

For the body does not consist of one member but of many. If the foot should say, ‘Because I am not a hand, I do not belong to the body,’ that would not make it any less a part of the body.

The eye cannot say to the hand, ‘I have no need of you,’ nor again the head to the feet, ‘I have no need of you.’ On the contrary, the parts of the body that seem to be weaker are indispensable” (1 Corinthians 12:4–7, 14–15, 21–22).

3. You should serve with the time, talents, and funds that you have.

Your time, talents, and funds should be put to work for the kingdom of God.

There is a proverb that says, “If you want something done, ask a busy person.” This rings true since a busy person is using their time to get things done. A slothful person squanders their time. Are you using your time well? Is your time a stewardship from God?

Similarly, the wealthy are in danger of squandering their wealth by not being generous with what God has provided. Talents and skills also can be of little value for the kingdom of God when they are solely employed to serve our own kingdom.

We all have time, talents, and resources that ought to be put to work for the kingdom of God.

As for the rich in this present age, charge them not to be haughty, nor to set their hopes on the uncertainty of riches, but on God, who richly provides us with everything to enjoy. They are to do good, to be rich in good works, to be generous and ready to share, thus storing up treasure for themselves as a good foundation for the future, so that they may take hold of that which is truly life” (1 Timothy 6:17–19).

Look carefully then how you walk, not as unwise but as wise, making the best use of the time, because the days are evil” (Ephesians 5:15–16).

Do not neglect to do good and to share what you have, for such sacrifices are pleasing to God” (Hebrews 13:16).

4. There must be a special love and priority given to the family of faith and the house of worship.

We know that the Scriptures teach that a family must care for their own. Know that this same principle is true in the church as well. If we are part of the family, then we care for the family in tangible ways. If one is working, we’re all working. We care for each other and the house we gather in to worship God. Our priorities can easily be misplaced to serve our own interests rather than the interests of others.

But if anyone does not provide for his relatives, and especially for members of his household, he has denied the faith and is worse than an unbeliever” (1 Timothy 5:8).

So then, as we have opportunity, let us do good to everyone, and especially to those who are of the household of faith” (Galatians 6:10).

Thus says the Lord of hosts: ‘These people say the time has not yet come to rebuild the house of the Lord.’ Then the word of the Lord came by the hand of Haggai the prophet, ‘Is it a time for you yourselves to dwell in your paneled [decorated and finished] houses, while this house lies in ruins?’ (Haggai 1:2–4).

5. We serve without self-interest but there is a great reward in serving and giving freely.

Our motivation in serving must be out of love for God and how he has so wondrously served us, saving us, and bringing us into his kingdom. Yet the Scriptures teach us that those who give are rewarded, those who serve are blessed, but those who withhold giving suffer loss. Have you experienced God’s reward in your giving and service?

One gives freely yet grows all the richer; another withholds what he should give, and only suffers want” (Proverbs 11:24).

Whoever brings blessing will be enriched, and one who waters will himself be watered” (Proverbs 11:25).

You looked for much, and behold, it came to little. And when you brought it home, I blew it away. Why? declares the Lord of hosts. Because of my house that lies in ruins, while each of you busies himself with his own house. Therefore the heavens above you have withheld the dew, and the earth has withheld its produce” (Haggai 1:9–10).

In all things I have shown you that by working hard in this way we must help the weak and remember the words of the Lord Jesus, how he himself said, ‘It is more blessed to give than to receive’” (Acts 20:35).

6. Our service among each other is not for profit.

God’s law forbids charging interest or profiting off a brother or the poor. We should not expect to conduct our work among the family of faith as we do in the world. Our gifts of service and help are just that—gifts. We should not expect to serve the Lord and receive earthly wages.

You shall not charge interest on loans to your brother, interest on money, interest on food, interest on anything that is lent for interest. You may charge a foreigner interest, but you may not charge your brother interest, that the Lord your God may bless you in all that you undertake in the land that you are entering to take possession of it” (Deuteronomy 23:19–20).

If your brother becomes poor and cannot maintain himself with you, you shall support him as though he were a stranger and a sojourner, and he shall live with you. Take no interest from him or profit, but fear your God, that your brother may live beside you. You shall not lend him your money at interest, nor give him your food for profit” (Leviticus 25:35–37).

7. Service can be encouraged, but not exacted.

Demands cannot be made to force someone to give. It is an act of love and devotion to the Lord rather than coercion or force. Service is not exacted, motivated by guilt or fear. We each serve the Lord and will each stand before him to give an account. Leaders in the church must be examples of willing service, not for monetary gain or prestige, but for Christ.

“As each has received a gift, use it to serve one another, as good stewards of God’s varied grace: whoever speaks, as one who speaks oracles of God; whoever serves, as one who serves by the strength that God supplies—in order that in everything God may be glorified through Jesus Christ. To him belong glory and dominion forever and ever. Amen” (1 Peter 4:10–11).

“So I exhort the elders among you, as a fellow elder and a witness of the sufferings of Christ, as well as a partaker in the glory that is going to be revealed: shepherd the flock of God that is among you, exercising oversight, not under compulsion, but willingly, as God would have you; not for shameful gain, but eagerly; not domineering over those in your charge, but being examples to the flock” (1 Peter 5:1–3).

8. Service is Christ-like and pleasing to God.

When a person is born again, they are molded and transformed into the likeness of Jesus Christ. Their lives are now a living sacrifice of service to him. This is a form of worship that is pleasing to God. Every Christian wants to please his master and does this by serving his body, the family of faith.

When we do this, our work will be salt and light in a dark and unsavory world. So let us shine a light on Christ through our deeds of faith and acts of loving service.

For even the Son of Man came not to be served but to serve, and to give his life as a ransom for many” (Mark 10:45).

Whatever you do, work heartily, as for the Lord and not for men, knowing that from the Lord you will receive the inheritance as your reward. You are serving the Lord Christ” (Colossians 3:23–24).

I appeal to you therefore, brothers, by the mercies of God, to present your bodies as a living sacrifice, holy and acceptable to God, which is your spiritual worship” (Romans 12:1).

Conclusion

May God give you grace to live a life of service for his fame and your good. If you want to see current ways to serve, visit www.fairviewbaptistchurch.ca/serve or contact the church.

Now may the God of peace who brought again from the dead our Lord Jesus, the great shepherd of the sheep, by the blood of the eternal covenant, equip you with everything good that you may do his will, working in us that which is pleasing in his sight, through Jesus Christ, to whom be glory forever and ever. Amen” (Hebrews 13:20–21).

George Whitefield

George Whitefield was born in Gloucester in 1714. His mother was an unsuccessful innkeeper with limited success and was distant from her son’s life. This resulted in Whitefield having a poor childhood, but that did not prevent him from having a good education. Since he was a resident of Gloucester, Whitefield attended a Grammar School to receive an education. Despite having the opportunity to have a good education, Whitefield describes his early life as far from God based on his activities and behavior. In his writings, he confesses that he was addicted to lying, filthy speech, belittling people, not going to church, playing cards, and being a romance reader. The one area that was a specific vice to a young Whitefield was skipping school to visit the theatre to watch, practice, and participate in performances. 

He was a gifted young actor who could recall lots of information from memory and recite famous speeches. At the age of fifteen, Whitefield left school and gave up pursuits of higher education. Historians believe that his mother was a factor in this because of the need to assist her in business so he could support himself and the family financially. However, his mother’s inn did not flourish, and she had to resign. Whitefield, not being shy with words (and with a dash of humor), said about this time, “I put on my blue apron, washed cups, cleaned rooms, and, in one word, became a professed common drawer for nigh a year and a half.” 

Unsure of what to do next, an old classmate of Whitefield encouraged him to go to Oxford. The only problem was that he had to finish Grammar School. This did not sway him, so he went back to school and received his education. After he did that, he entered Pembrook College at Oxford at the age of eighteen. Whitefield was a poor student who needed to work to pay for his time at Oxford. He did this by working hard as a servitor for wealthy students, and while at the college, he started to develop deep religious convictions that he did not have before. He started learning more about Christianity and desired a change to live for Christ. He used his free time to visit prisons, read to prisoners, and always tried to do what was right in his daily life. While searching for like-minded people with similar convictions he stumbled upon two brothers, John and Charles Wesley. These three were devoted to piety and were a works righteousness group at that time known for their strict “method” of living, so they had the title “Methodists.”

The difficulty was that Whitefield lacked an understanding of God’s grace. He recounts that he was running the risk of becoming a Roman Catholic, an ascetic (a monk), a mystic, and having a religion of complete self-denial. Whitefield thought that by persistently and voluntarily denying himself, he would have a “great promotion of the spiritual life.” Despite this dark time in his life, he was recommended five books that helped him greatly: Henry Scougal’s Life of God in the Soul of Man, William Law’s Serious Call, Richard Baxter’s Call to the Unconverted, Joseph Alleine’s Alarm to Unconverted Sinners, and Matthew Henry’s Commentary. Reading these alongside Scripture provided him with the much help he desperately needed. Whitefield’s eyes opened to understand the liberty of the gospel of Jesus Christ and the free gift of God’s grace. Whitefield repented of his former ways of seeking Christian perfectionism. 

The more he read, the more he fell in love with Christ and the doctrines of grace. These sunk deep into his heart and became the driving force of his Christian convictions and preaching. At twenty-two, not by his own seeking, he was ordained as a deacon in the Anglican church. With guidance from the bishop, he started to preach around London, and to his amazement, he drew crowds who were listening to his words. Whitefield brought something new that people had not experienced before by using his voice to preach passionately with tones, emotions, and voice inflections.

In 1737, the Wesley brothers pressured Whitefield to visit Georgia in North America to assist in the care of an orphan house to help care for the children of colonists. Whitefield agreed and sailed for Georgia, but he only stayed about three months because he needed to return to England. The impact of the orphan house was something he felt great conviction over that occupied much of his attention from this period of his life until he died. 

While back in England, he found many churches refusing to accept his preaching style, teachings on the new birth, and the doctrine of regeneration. Whitefield was surprised because he noticed that many Bishops (his superiors) could tolerate Arianism (Jesus was created), Socinianism (Jesus was merely human), and Deism (God does not interfere with His creation) in the churches. Whitefield was bold and did not allow that to hinder him, so he unashamedly declared the atonement of Christ and the inner working of the Holy Spirit. In short, from this period of his life, Whitefield’s field of usefulness within the Church of England narrowed rapidly on every side. 

Whitefield being turned away from many churches gave him a unique opportunity which was to adopt a system of “open-air preaching” where no document or wooden pulpit stood between him and his audience. His convictions were strong to preach outdoors as he observed thousands of people who would not attend church, refusing to go to church, and those who went to church were not hearing the Gospel. So, he decided to go out to them based on Luke ​​14:23 “So the master told his servant, ‘Go out to the highways and hedges and compel them to come in so that my house will be full.’” His first attempt to do open-air preaching was among the colliers (coal miners) at Kingswood near Bristol, in February 1739. After praying, he went up a hill and began to preach to about a hundred colliers from Matthew 5:1–3.

Being turned away from many churches in England because of his unique preaching style gave Whitefield a unique opportunity to adopt an “open-air preaching” system where no document or wooden pulpit stood between him and his audience. His convictions were strong to preach outdoors as he observed thousands of people – those who did not attend church, those who refused to enter a church, and those who went to the gospel-less churches. So, he decided to go out to them based on Luke ​​14:23 “So the master told his servant, ‘Go out to the highways and hedges and compel them to come in so that my house will be full.’” His first attempt to do open-air preaching was among the colliers (coal miners) at Kingswood near Bristol, in February 1739. After praying, he went up a hill and began to preach to about a hundred colliers from Matthew 5:1–3. Whitefield’s preaching on the saving grace of Jesus Christ, calling sinners to repentance, was so powerful the colliers that these men had “white gutters” made on their cheeks as tears fell from their soot-covered faces as they came out of the coalpits. Hundreds of them, many of whom had never been to church, were brought under the deep conviction of sin and encouragement because Whitefield’s preaching pointed out that Jesus came to save not only the wealthy, and the politicians but also the hardworking blue-collar class. The event at Kingswood also showed Whitefield’s personal care for the soul of the individual as he was not shy to meet with the colliers to talk with them one-on-one.

Whitefield’s preaching to the commoners with his open-air style of preaching soon gained traction. On one occasion, he was asked to be a guest preacher at a church in London, and while praying churchwardens came to ask if he had a preaching license. Whitefield did not have a license, so he was forbidden to preach. After being told this he went outside and started preaching in the churchyard. Two days after his removal from the church he preached in an open field to about 30,000 people majority of whom were not churchgoers. It is said, “the gospel so proclaimed was listened to and greedily received by hundreds who never dreamed of going to a place of worship.”  Though he considered himself an Anglican, he had difficulties with the Church of England due to not having a license, but he would not allow denomination or geographical lines to break the importance of unity which can only be found in Christ and upholding Scripture. 

In 1739, Whitefield returned to American colonies to preach the gospel. He started in Philadelphia and as he continued to preach wherever he went, even the largest churches could not hold the crowds that came to hear him. So, he went back to preaching in the open fields which resulted in people coming from great distances often exceeding the population of the town he was preaching in. His preaching style was unique, though he was mentored by the Wesleys, Whitefield had different convictions than the Wesley brothers, and he was a convinced Calvinist. Much of his preaching emphasized the “new birth,” which he pointed to as the “conversion experience.” Whitefield never pleaded with people to convert or have to alter calls, but his plea was to have people repent and encourage the new birth through his preaching.

Whitefield continued his preaching journeys in America and Europe, One visit to Ireland was particularly unique as he was almost murdered by a Roman Catholic mob in Dublin. While in America, Jonathan Edwards’s wife, Sarah, remarked, “[Whitefield] makes less of the doctrines than our American preachers generally do and aims more at affecting the heart. He is a born orator.” Whitefield also made the slave communities a part of his revivals, though he was far from an abolitionist. Nonetheless, he increasingly sought out audiences of slaves and wrote on their behalf. Everywhere Whitefield preached, he collected support for the orphanage he had founded in Georgia, though the orphanage was a financial and time-commitment challenge for him, he trusted in God for keeping it. His actions in America (along with many other faithful preachers) sparked a spiritual revival known as “the Great Awakening,” which became one of the most formative events in American history. While in Scotland he preached evening services to thousands and would often go until 2am. There were even times when it was estimated that he preached to an estimated 20,000 people.

Whitefield’s preaching schedule would look something like this: 

– Every Sunday he administered the Lord’s Supper to hundreds of communicants at 6:30am. Afterward, he prayed and preached in the morning and afternoon. He would preach again in the evening at 5:30 by addressing the people on the margins of society.
– Monday, Tuesday, Wednesday, and Thursday morning he would preach at 6am.
– He delivered evening lectures on Monday, Tuesday, Wednesday, Thursday, and Saturday.

As a result, he delivered about thirteen sermons a week. All the while still maintaining connections with people and sending funds to the orphanage. Unfortunately, Whitefield’s preaching, lectures, and correspondence successes did not benefit his private family life. Whitefield was skeptical of the idea of marriage and feared having a wife would take away from his preaching. When he finally married an older widow, Elizabeth James, sadly, little is mentioned of his wife in his letters and their union never blossomed into a healthy marriage. He left no children. 

In 1770, the 55-year-old continued his preaching tour in the North American colonies despite poor health and ignored dangerous signs of asthmatic colds and breathing difficulties. Whitefield stated, “I would rather wear out than rust out.” History notes that his last sermon took place in the fields, atop a large barrel, and he was encouraged to preach one last time. He agreed to preach until a large candle went out. His final message was on the “ inefficiency of works to merit salvation,” it is recounted that in this message Whitefield shouted “Works! works! A man gets to heaven by works! I would as soon think of climbing to the moon on a rope of sand.” The following morning he died in the parsonage of Old South Presbyterian Church, Newburyport, Massachusetts, on 30 September 1770, and was buried, according to his wishes, in a crypt under the pulpit of this church. Despite their differences, John Wesley preached his funeral sermon in London at Whitefield’s request.

Looking at the life of George Whitefield one would see a man’s passion for the Gospel and unity among believers. He was not the strongest theologian, but a man God would use to hit the hearts of the masses, calling them to repentance and to enter into the new birth. He labored hard for the Lord but never trusted in his works to save him, and lived for Christ because of the grace that was bestowed upon him.  

Thomas Watson

Thomas Watson said, “Repentance is a grace of God’s Spirit whereby a sinner is inwardly humbled and visibly reformed.” The Doctrine of Repentance, 18.

Thomas Watson (1620-1686) was born probably in Yorkshire, England. In his life, Thomas Watson, married Abigail Beadle in 1647. Thomas and Abigail had at least seven children during their marriage. Watson’s life was one that had many trials. Despite being strongly Presbyterian, during the English Civil War, Watson was sympathetic to the Monarchy. In 1651, he was imprisoned for a plot to reinstate Charles II in England, leading to the execution of his friend, Christopher Love. However, Watson was released under a petition for mercy. 

Over time Watson’s convictions on church and state changed, he became a nonconformist and was against the Church of England. This is because in 1662 he refused to comply with the Act of Uniformity that declared all public prayers, how the sacraments were to be administered and the ordination process of Bishops, Priests, and Deacons within the Church of England must conform to the rites and ceremonies prescribed in the 1662 Book of Common Prayer. Non-conformity would result in serious consequences of removal from the church and the potential of exile, prison, and even death. 

Watson and other clergy disagreed with the act, resulting in his removal from the pastorate. Even with no church building, he could not be stopped from preaching, even when it was illegal. He preached in barns, homes, and in the woods. Wherever he could preach, he did! 

In 1666, after the Great Fire of London, Watson prepared a large room for public worship, welcoming anyone who wished to attend. In 1672, after the ‘Act of Indulgences’ (granting religious freedom), Watson obtained a license for Crosby Hall, Bishopsgate, where he preached until his health failed. Watson died in 1686 while in his home in Essex. It is believed that he died while praying in his prayer closet. Thomas Watson left this life and entered into glory all while communing with God. 

C.H. Spurgeon said, “Happy were the citizens who regularly attended so instructive and spiritual a ministry [under Thomas Watson] … Going in and out among his flock, fired with holy zeal for their eternal welfare, his years rolled on pleasantly enough amid the growing respect of all who knew him.” 

Amongst the Puritans, Thomas Watson is known for his concise writing, gift of illustration, and application for the Christian journey. To learn more from Thomas Watson, read his books All Things for Good and The Doctrine of Repentance

Walter Marshal

You cannot love God if you are under the continual secret suspicion that he is really your enemy! … You simply cannot love God unless you know and understand how much he loves you. … In the gospel, you can come to know that God truly loves you through Christ. When you have this assurance, you can even love your enemies, because you know that you are reconciled to God. You know that God’s love will make people’s hatred of you work together for your good.” ― Walter Marshall, The Gospel Mystery of Sanctification: Growing in Holiness

Walter Marshall was born in 1628 at Bishops Wearmouth in Durham, England. He was a studious young man who entered Winchester College at eleven. Marshall then went to New College, Oxford, from 1648 to 1657. He earned his B.A. in 1652 and four years later he became the vicar of Hursley, Hampshire, during that time he also served at Winchester College in the areas of teaching, research, and management. Around this time he was married and had two daughters. 

In 1662, the Act of Uniformity passed that declared all public prayers, how the sacraments were to be administered and the ordination process of Bishops, Priests, and Deacons within the Church of England must conform to the rites and ceremonies prescribed in the 1662 Book of Common Prayer. Non-conformity would result in serious consequences of removal from the church and the potential of exile, prison, and even death. Marshall did not submit based on his conscience, so he along with many other nonconformists were ejected from their church on the 90th anniversary of the St. Bartholomew’s Day massacre.  

Being true to his convictions, Marshall eventually became an Independent congregationalist at Gosport, Hampshire, where he served his remaining days. It was while at Gosport he wrote a book titled Gospel Mystery inspired by 1 Timothy 3:16. Despite having a church and a book that gave him notoriety, Marshall suffered from periods of depression and spiritual difficulties. He interacted with Richard Baxter who saw Marshall as too legalistic. He then went on to meet with Thomas Goodwin, in whom he confided that his sins were constantly weighing on his mind. Goodwin exhorted Marshall because it appeared he had forgotten the Gospel of Jesus Christ who offered the remission of his sins and the sanctifying work of Christ is part of His nature. This helped Marshall with a new vigor to preach and study Christ rather than always looking at himself. In the past, he would often view “personal righteousness [as] the basis of his dealings with God” for some form of peace in his life. This personal revelation resulted in a focus on Christ for holiness, “peace of conscience,” and true joy found in the Holy Spirit. Through this period of challenge and overcoming, he wrote his The Gospel Mystery of Sanctification. 

Marshall died at Gosport in 1680. Before he died, he said to his visitors, “I die in the full persuasion of the truth and in the comfort of that doctrine which I have preached to you.” He then offered his last words, “The wages of sin is death; but the gift of God is eternal life through Jesus Christ our Lord” (Rom 6:23).

Walter Marshall did not gain recognition for his preaching, but his writings and the way he lived commended him to others. He taught that union with Christ and combining the means of grace will result in a “fruitful and blessed life. Such a pursuit will abase our flesh, exalt God, and coalesce with all the doctrines of grace.” (Joel Beeke). 

Cotton Mather

Cotton Mather (1663-1729), was a third-generation American Puritan, son of Increase Mather, and grandson of John Cotton. He entered Harvard at 12 by passing the entrance exam highlighting his gifting in Latin and Greek. At the age of 18, he received his M.A. from his father, who was the president at Harvard. 

Mather wrestled with his faith from a young age, at times he was so concerned about his salvation that he would appear depressed, and at other times he was ecstatic with the excitement of heaven. Regardless of his emotional state, he was noted as having a continual “conversation with heaven.” Having a speech impediment held him back from the ministry so he pursued becoming a physician, which he had a lifelong interest in. After a friend persuaded him not to view his speech limitations as a hindrance to pastoral work, he went back into religious studies. In 1680, he preached his first sermon at his father’s church from the pulpit of his grandfather. Five years later he was ordained into the ministry at his father’s church. The two developed deep bonds as father and son as well as colleagues. 

Like his father, Mather was a staunch defender of Puritan orthodoxy who devoted his life to praying, preaching, writing, raising a family, and publishing. He still followed his passion for caring for others. This was seen as he encouraged some revolutionary ideas for the time: encouraging schoolmasters to reward instead of punish the student, one of his most lasting medical legacies, was in the scope of counseling, which was to show care and treatment to people who were struggling with mental illness by looking to external factors which may have attributed to the condition. His interest in the sciences made him unique among many of his American contemporaries as he was a strong advocate of a “new germ theory and inoculation against smallpox” which ran counter to many of Boston’s physicians during the epidemic of 1721. After Mather inoculated his own son, a bomb was thrown through his chamber window by those who opposed. Despite facing criticism of his medical views, Mather stood by his principles. He was a proponent of a temperate diet, physical exercise, and the discouragement of smoking which was unique at the time. Mather wrote on the importance of integrating faith and science, staying true to his reformed roots he was able to articulate the importance of reason and explaining one’s experience. Through such writings he was able to articulate God in the “wonders of the earth and universe beyond” and at the same time anticipate the rise of Deism of the 18th century. He was known as a “vigorous defender of the Reformed doctrines of grace” which caused tensions within his family (particularly his father) because he encouraged others to consider Yale for ministry because of the rise of liberal teachings coming out of Harvard, where his father had been president.

In his private life, he was widowed twice and had 15 children by his three wives—Abigail Phillips, Elizabeth Hubbard, and Lydia George (who became mentally unstable)— with only two children surviving him. Mather was a product of his time, while, he was not against the institution of slavery and he had a number of slaves in his household. On the other hand, he stood against the mistreatment of slaves and urged slave owners to view slaves as “servants” who needed to be taught the Christian faith, accept them as spiritual brothers and sisters, and treat them justly and kindly. Unfortunately, all of the good that Mather did, is often overshadowed by his involvement in the Salem Witch Trials, which have garnered a poor reputation. Working with his father, Mather was passionate about justice but he also showed compassion, taking an accused girl into his own home in order to teach and guide her on the right path. Mather purported that cases against a witch were often on suspected “spectral evidence” (testimonial of the victim being attacked by a spiritual force), which Mather did not support as reliable evidence.

In his writings, he published more than four hundred works on all aspects of areas of life: theological, historical, biographical, political, and scientific. Some of which influenced the likes of Benjamin Franklin and John Ryland. While many of his books were influential in academic circles, what would be recommended for the average reader would be his powerful little book on the family unit titled, “A Family Well Ordered.” This book has extra weight added to it after reading Mather’s life, especially after all the challenges that he faced, he still saw the value of having a home that honored Christ. Reading the life of Cotton Mather, one will see a man who stuck to Scriptural principles. He trusted the Lord’s leading in all facets of his life, and at the same time recognized that the Lord had gifted him with a mind that was to be used for the betterment of society by bringing God the glory. 

Wrestle with the Lord. Accept no denial. Earnestly protest, “Lord, I will not let Thee go unless Thou bless this poor child of mine and make it Thine own!”  Do this until, if it may be, your heart is raised by a touch of heaven to a belief that God has blessed this child, and it shall be blessed and saved forever.”
– Cotton Mather, A Family Well Ordered

Joseph Alleine

Conversion is a work above man’s power … Never think you can convert yourself. If ever you would be savingly converted, you must despair of doing it in your own strength. It is a resurrection from the dead, a new creation, a work of absolute omnipotence … Conversion is a supernatural work.
— Joseph Alleine, An Alarm to Unconverted Sinners.

Joseph Alleine (1634-1668) was born at Devizes, Wiltshire, and from a young age, he was an exceptionally gifted student who was willing to serve the Lord. When he was around eleven years old, after the death of his brother, Edward, a clergyman, Alleine pleaded for an education so that he could replace his brother in the ministry of the church. At the age of sixteen, he proved his worth and went on to study at Oxford. While studying, he learned from the Puritans John Owen and Thomas Goodwin, who helped form much of his Puritan convictions. Studying during these times would not have been easy for a Puritan mind, because of the political climate of the day Charles I was beheaded and his son, Charles II, at the head of a Scottish army, was defeated by Cromwell’s Parliamentarians at Worcester. 

Alleine graduated from Oxford in 1653 at nineteen with a B.A. and soon became a tutor and chaplain within Oxford. He was also a pastor to those in need as he intentionally took time to preach to prisoners in the county jail, visit the sick, and minister to the poor. Two years later, he accepted the role of an assistant to George Newton, the vicar of a church in Taunton, Somerset. This location was known as a “Puritan Stronghold” with about 20,000 people. That same year he married his cousin, Theodosia. Historians share that she was a woman who feared God, and early in their marriage, she ran a home school of about fifty scholars, with half needing food and lodging. She would later serve as her husband’s biographer after his death.

While in Taunton, his ministry was successful as he preached the Word faithfully, had deep relations with his flock, and even offered catechesis classes. Alleine was noticed by the Puritan Richard Baxter, who was impressed by his care for his congregants. However, in 1662, Alleine and many other Puritans were removed from their position because of the Act of Nonconformity. After being ejected from his church, he used this to bolster his preaching and averaged one to two sermons each day for nine months until he was arrested and put in jail. However, that still did not sway him from preaching, as his cell became a pulpit as he preached to the masses through the bars. His release in 1664 did not last long, and was arrested a second time for preaching on July 10, 1666. Upon his second release in 1668, he returned to Taunton where he started his ministry but became very ill because of the arrests, and ministering to his flock took its toll on his mind and body. Nine months later, at age thirty-four, Alleine died, and on his deathbed, he was praising God and saying, “Christ is mine, and I am His— His by covenant.”

Joseph Alleine’s life was short, but one that God used to show people (particularly ministers) the importance of staying faithful to the Gospel even in the face of adversity. Meanwhile, still have the heart to care for those we are close to. 

If you want to learn more about Joseph Alleine, read his A Sure Guide to Heaven or also titled An Alarm to Unconverted Sinners. It will help most people with its clear and easy statements of sharing what the Christian Gospel message really is, even providing answers to questions that even a person of the twenty-first century would ask valuable questions as “Why is conversion necessary?” and “What are the motives to conversion?”